Photo Credit: “Preservation of our public lands without scientific management is reducing the prevalence of many of the species that I enjoyed as a kid. That means more threatened and endangered species. I don’t want my children to ever ask me, ‘Dad, have you ever seen a golden-winged warbler?’ ” Photo by Caleb Putnam shared via Flickr Creative Commons
As a young boy, I hiked, hunted and trapped. It was common to hear quail and grouse in young forests as sparrowhawks flew overhead. Today, these birds are rare in New Jersey’s forests and have been replaced by species like pileated woodpeckers, which feed on larvae beneath the bark of old, weakened trees.
An Aging Forest
The Pine Barrens of New Jersey is a 1.1-million-acre fire adapted ecosystem. It evolved with periodic fire, which renewed the forest and created a patchwork of different stand ages and sizes. The resulting mosaic supported a myriad of plant and animal species. Fast forward, and our exclusion of periodic fire and the lack of forest thinning leaves us with an old forest infested with pine beetles, which are native but more likely to kill weak (i.e., old and dense) trees. The result is a massive fuel accumulation that has been described by an article in the Rolling Stone as potentially catastrophic. As Figure 1 shows, New Jersey’s forests are becoming primarily large and mature.
Who wants to leave our forests at the mercy of catastrophic wildfire and destructive pests?
A Solution Foiled
As a response, the New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife approved a Forest Stewardship Plan (developed through a partnership with the New Jersey Audubon Society). The goal was to create habitat for the golden-winged warbler, a species that is quickly disappearing as our forests age. On a 3,000-acre parcel of state land known as Sparta Mountain, the plan proposed a series of 20-acre patch harvests over a 10-year period (totaling at 200 treated acres).
The outcry was instantaneous and loud, with concerned citizens and local environmental organizations claiming that this was a “logging plan.” Similar concern over logging had already removed the timber industry from most of our state, which is dearly needed to address these problems of dangerous fuel accumulations and a lack of diversity.
An Invasive Species Exacerbates the Problem
New Jersey has also recently been invaded by the non-native emerald ash borer, an insect that preys on ash trees. The ash population in New Jersey is estimated to be around 8 million. Mortality projections indicate that they will all be killed if left untreated. With no forest industry left in New Jersey, who will take down these dead trees? What of the increased fire risk that comes with 8 million dead trees in the forest?
New Jersey’s forest health crisis presents the need for scientists and those interested in the benefits and enjoyment of the forest to agree on a productive path forward.
Time to Come Together
We can all agree that we want a healthy and diverse forest for our children, so let’s reverse engineer that outcome by sitting down, finding some points of agreement and planning a solution. I see several points of agreement that could serve as a good foundation:
- First, we can all agree about the widespread presence of pine beetles and the need to address this before we lose our pine forests altogether.
- Second, we need to recognize that removing infested trees is an important part of addressing that problem.
- Third, to accomplish these goals, and to deal with the inevitable ash tree mortality, we need a functioning forest products industry. Otherwise, we place an unrealistic economic burden on the residents of New Jersey.
- Fourth, forest diversity supports ecosystem diversity, from the smallest invertebrates to the largest carnivores. We should all be able to get behind the goal of increasing biodiversity, even if it requires some harvesting.
The economic burden placed on our children to address these problems will be astronomical, unless we find a way to reintroduce the forest products industry.
I don’t want my children to ever ask me, ‘Dad what does grouse drumming sound like?’ Or, ‘Have you ever seen a golden-winged warbler?’
Preservation of our public lands without scientific management is reducing the abundance of many of the species I enjoyed as a kid. That means more threatened and endangered species. I don’t want my children to ever ask me, “Dad what does grouse drumming sound like?” Or, “Have you ever seen a golden-winged warbler?”
We have identified the problems that are before us, and we have many points of agreement. Let’s get beyond the rhetoric and start the work.
Written by William F. Brash, Jr., New Jersey Fire Safety Council
Please note that comments are manually approved by a website administrator and may take some time to appear.
Thanks for sharing your passion Bill! I love those forests too, and I know it’s hard to see them degraded or be destroyed.
Thanks for the kind words. Doing our best like you do in New Mexico. It’s a challenge for sure.
BILL- KEEP MAKING YOUR POINTS!! NEW JERSEY IS A MOST DIFFICULT STATE WITH REGARDS TO THE MANAGEMENT OF OUR PUBLIC FORESTS – ONE DAY THE FOREST WILL DO WHAT IT WILL DO AND THE FIRE WON’T BE PRETTY!!
GOOD LUCK!! THANK YOU!
The thing is — and yes there always is one — the pro-harvest stewardship plans are being proposed in northern NJ’s Highlands, for the healthiest, most biodiverse, least invasives-plagued forests, which are more age diverse than claimed. Where we truly need management the most in the north, say, in southeastern Morris County, where vast hillsides of barberry have replaced healthy understories, stewardship plans are not being proposed, because the challenged forests are not profitable for the timber industry, thus there is little incentive to propose a plan. The fact is, we need ecologically driven plans implemented, not ones that can only move forward if the timber industry benefits.
So, are you only going to put up replies that are supportive of your point of view?
The Sparta Mountain Forest Stewardship Plan was a seriously flawed plan and hundreds of citizens and scientists have stated that. Logging is not stewardship!
Thank you for submitting a comment to the FAC Net blog. Comments must be manually approved by a website administrator, which is why your comment didn’t automatically appear.
I live on the border of the area being “saved” by the Sparta Mountain Stewardship plan. Stand 18 has been denuded. There is no canopy. The trees are essentially gone. I’ve been fighting against this stewardship plan for 2 years. The fight is not against Stewardship, it’s against this plan because it neglects to take into account soil reports, and species analyses of the areas it’s planning to “improve”. The plan places hierarchy on which species deserve “protecting” and which don’t. I could go on, but the bottom line is the science is bad and the areas are being chosen based on their value as a commodity, not by which need the most help.